Update README.md

README.md

@@ -77,13 +77,6 @@ To evaluate on the two test sets (valence_shifting and valence stable) and calcu
 python eval_perplexity.py --model_dir $model_dir --stable_path $path_to_json --shift_path $path_to_json --batch_size 2
 
 ```
-A comparison of all continual learning strategies can be found below. 
-
-Method | Perplexity | Forward Gen. | Best Case | Worst Case 
---- | :---: | :---: | :---: |:---:
-Sequential FT | 34\% $\uparrow$ | 33\% $\uparrow$ | 4.58 (1750--99) | 6.64 (1950--2000) 
-EWC           | 12\% $\uparrow$ | 29\% $\uparrow$ | 4.65 (1800--49) | 6.77 (1950--2000) 
-LoRA          | 15\% $\uparrow$ | 27\% $\uparrow$ | 4.48 (1850--99) | 6.19 (1950--2000) 
 
 
 ## Credits