Create README.md
Browse files
README.md
ADDED
|
@@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
---
|
| 2 |
+
license: apache-2.0
|
| 3 |
+
language: en
|
| 4 |
+
tags:
|
| 5 |
+
- llama
|
| 6 |
+
- instruction-residual
|
| 7 |
+
- parameter-efficient
|
| 8 |
+
- safetensors
|
| 9 |
+
- transformers
|
| 10 |
+
base_model:
|
| 11 |
+
- meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B
|
| 12 |
+
- meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct
|
| 13 |
+
---
|
| 14 |
+
|
| 15 |
+
# Llama-3.1-8b-Instruct-Residual
|
| 16 |
+
|
| 17 |
+
**Full-rank instruction residual for Llama-3.1-8B**
|
| 18 |
+
|
| 19 |
+
This repository provides the **full-rank instruction residual** \(Δθ = θ_{instruct} - θ_{base}\) between the instruction-tuned Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct model and its corresponding base Llama-3.1-8B model. By adding this residual to a fresh base checkpoint, you can restore instruction-following capabilities **without** running a full fine-tuning cycle.
|
| 20 |
+
|
| 21 |
+
## How it was created
|
| 22 |
+
|
| 23 |
+
We follow the *instruction residual* approach introduced by Jindal et al. (2024):
|
| 24 |
+
|
| 25 |
+
> “In this section, we describe the instruction residual approach to simply regain the instruction following capabilities. We compute the instruction residual between an instruction following LLM \(θ_{i,d_1,v_1}\) and its corresponding base model \(θ_{b,d_1}\) in the parametric space as
|
| 26 |
+
> \[
|
| 27 |
+
> Θ_{r,v_1} = θ_{i,d_1,v_1} - θ_{b,d_1}.
|
| 28 |
+
> \]
|
| 29 |
+
> This tensor subtraction extracts the instruction-specific information, which can then be added to any base model.”
|
| 30 |
+
|
| 31 |
+
The full paper is available at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10739
|
| 32 |
+
|
| 33 |
+
## Files
|
| 34 |
+
|
| 35 |
+
- `pytorch_model.safetensors` — full-rank FP16 residual weights (~16 GB).
|
| 36 |
+
- `config.json` — configuration matching the Llama-3.1-8B architecture.
|
| 37 |
+
- `README.md` — this model card.
|
| 38 |
+
|
| 39 |
+
## Usage
|
| 40 |
+
|
| 41 |
+
Below is a minimal example showing how to apply the residual to a base model:
|
| 42 |
+
|
| 43 |
+
```python
|
| 44 |
+
from transformers import AutoModelForCausalLM
|
| 45 |
+
from safetensors.torch import load_file
|
| 46 |
+
import torch
|
| 47 |
+
|
| 48 |
+
# 1) Load base
|
| 49 |
+
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
|
| 50 |
+
"meta-llama/Llama-3.1-8B",
|
| 51 |
+
torch_dtype=torch.float16,
|
| 52 |
+
device_map="auto",
|
| 53 |
+
)
|
| 54 |
+
|
| 55 |
+
# 2) Load residual
|
| 56 |
+
residual_sd = load_file("pytorch_model.safetensors", device="cpu")
|
| 57 |
+
|
| 58 |
+
# 3) Apply residual
|
| 59 |
+
for name, delta in residual_sd.items():
|
| 60 |
+
param = dict(model.named_parameters())[name]
|
| 61 |
+
param.data += delta.to(param.device).to(param.dtype)
|
| 62 |
+
|
| 63 |
+
# 4) Save or push
|
| 64 |
+
model.save_pretrained("llama-3.1-8b-base-plus-instruct")
|
| 65 |
+
```
|
| 66 |
+
|
| 67 |
+
For full scripts, see the `examples/` folder.
|
| 68 |
+
|
| 69 |
+
## Intended Use & Limitations
|
| 70 |
+
|
| 71 |
+
- **Intended Use**: Add instruction-following capabilities to Llama-3.1-8B base models.
|
| 72 |
+
- **Limitations**:
|
| 73 |
+
- Residual must match the exact base checkpoint.
|
| 74 |
+
- Stored in FP16 (~16 GB); dequantization needed if working in 4-bit.
|
| 75 |
+
- Applying to mismatched architectures will produce invalid weights.
|
| 76 |
+
|
| 77 |
+
## License
|
| 78 |
+
|
| 79 |
+
This residual is released under the **Apache License 2.0**. See the `LICENSE` file for details.
|
| 80 |
+
|
| 81 |
+
## References
|
| 82 |
+
As mentioned before this method was introduced by **Jindal et al., 2024**, arXiv:2410.10739.:
|
| 83 |
+
|
| 84 |
+
```bibtex
|
| 85 |
+
@misc{jindal2024balancingcontinuouspretraininginstruction,
|
| 86 |
+
title={Balancing Continuous Pre-Training and Instruction Fine-Tuning: Optimizing Instruction-Following in LLMs},
|
| 87 |
+
author={Ishan Jindal and Chandana Badrinath and Pranjal Bharti and Lakkidi Vinay and Sachin Dev Sharma},
|
| 88 |
+
year={2024},
|
| 89 |
+
eprint={2410.10739},
|
| 90 |
+
archivePrefix={arXiv},
|
| 91 |
+
primaryClass={cs.CL},
|
| 92 |
+
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10739},
|
| 93 |
+
}
|
| 94 |
+
```
|
| 95 |
+
|