UID
int64 1.96k
182k
| original_image
imagewidth (px) 864
1.34k
| edit_prompt
stringlengths 10
33
| edited_image
imagewidth (px) 864
1.34k
| SC_edit_success
float32 0
10
| SC_reasoning
stringlengths 124
654
| PQ_artifacts
float32 3
10
| PQ_reasoning
stringlengths 127
475
| O_score
float32 0
10
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
115,544
|
Remove beer glass
| 10
|
Image1 contains the beer glass, and Image2 has successfully removed it. No remaining parts of the beer glass are visible, no other objects were improperly removed or added, and no noticeable AI artifacts are introduced in Image2.
| 10
|
The image appears to be artifact-free with no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, and unnatural object shapes.
| 10
|
||
115,544
|
Remove foam on beer
| 0
|
Image1 contains foam on top of the beer. Image2 still contains foam on top of the beer, which is the object to be removed, thus failing to follow the editing instruction. Therefore, at least 2 points are deducted.
| 9
|
The image is mostly free of distortions and artifacts. The beer glass has a natural shape, and the reflections and transparency are handled well. However, there are minor anomalies in the foam and slight distortions in the detail of the glass edge that indicate it is AI-generated.
| 0
|
||
115,544
|
Remove liquid inside glass
| 10
|
Image1 contains a glass filled with liquid. In Image2, the liquid has been removed completely. There are no remaining objects that needed to be removed, no additional objects added, and no objects apart from the liquid have been removed. Also, there are no noticeable AI artifacts introduced in Image2.
| 8
|
The image is mostly well-rendered; however, there are slight distortions in the glass object's reflections and refractions. These artifacts slightly detract from the overall realism of the image.
| 8.944272
|
||
115,544
|
Remove glass stem
| 6
|
The editing instruction was to remove the glass stem from Image1.
1. Image1 does contain the glass stem. Proceeding to the next step.
2. Image2 does not contain the glass stem from Image1. No points deducted here.
3. Image2 removes the glass content and other elements inside the glass, which are not in the instruction. Deducting 2 points.
4. Image2 does not add new objects. No points deducted here.
5. Image2 introduces AI artifacts, especially visible around the base of the glass where the stem was removed, and the transparency of the glass appears inconsistent. Deducting 2 points.
| 8
|
The image shows a relatively well-rendered glass object with a few minor distortions. The shape of the glass and the reflection look natural for the most part. However, the bottom part of the glass shows some unusual artifacts and distortions which slightly affect the overall quality.
| 6.928203
|
||
115,544
|
Remove background elements
| 6
|
Image1 contains a glass of beer on a table with a background featuring different elements such as chairs and plants. Image2 successfully removes the glass of beer and other elements from Image1 and replaces them with a new background. However, Image2 introduces new objects such as a table, chair, and background greenery that were not in the original image and also does not have a visible smooth transition where the objects from Image1 were removed, possibly introducing AI artifacts.
| 3
|
The image shows significant distortions, especially with the unusual shape of the transparent object in the foreground. The legs of the table and the structure of the chairs also appear distorted and irregular.
| 4.24264
|
||
30,635
|
Remove person
| 8
|
1. Image1 contains a person who needs to be removed.
2. Image2 successfully removes the person from the original image.
3. Image2 does not remove any other objects that were not part of the instruction.
4. Image2 does not add any new objects.
5. Image2 introduces some AI artifacts around the area where the person was removed, such as unnatural lines and blending issues. Therefore, the overall score is reduced due to the presence of these artifacts.
| 9
|
The image is highly detailed with well-rendered elements and minimal distortions. There are no noticeable unusual body parts, proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The overall quality is very high with only slight minor imperfections that are difficult to detect.
| 8.485281
|
||
30,635
|
Remove green flames
| 10
|
Image1 contains green flames primarily on the character and weapon. Image2 successfully removes the green flames from the character and the weapon. The edited Image2 does not retain any of the green flames that need to be removed. No additional objects are removed or added, and no AI artifacts are introduced.
| 9
|
The image has a high level of detail and no significant distortions. The proportions and shapes of objects appear natural. Any minor artifacts are minimal and do not detract from the overall quality of the image.
| 9.486833
|
||
30,635
|
Remove skull crown
| 10
|
Image1 contains the skull crown on the character's head. In Image2, the skull crown has been removed. No remaining parts of the crown are visible in Image2, and no additional objects have been removed or added that were not mentioned in the instructions. There are no noticeable AI artifacts introduced in Image2 that degrade the image quality.
| 9
|
The image is well-crafted with high attention to detail. However, minor artifacts can be observed, such as slight distortions at the edges and slight inconsistencies in the lighting. The overall image is cohesive and visually appealing with no significant distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes.
| 9.486833
|
||
30,635
|
Remove glowing eyes
| 0
|
Image1 contains the object to be removed, which is the glowing eyes. Image2 contains a completely different scene instead of the original image with the edited instruction. The glowing eyes removal is not evident in Image2, and it actually adds and changes the whole context to an unrelated object (an eye with some visual elements painted on it). Steps 2, 3, and 4 apply massively here.
| 5
|
The image has noticeable distortions and unusual artifacts around the eye and makeup area. The strokes and shapes on the eye appear unnatural, and there is a blend of colors and textures that don't align properly.
| 0
|
||
1,963
|
Remove the person
| 8
|
Image1 contains the person to be removed. Image2 successfully removes the person without any parts remaining. No other objects are removed or added. However, Image2 introduces noticeable AI artifacts where the person used to be.
| 8
|
The image appears mostly artifact-free with well-rendered objects. There is a slight blur in the background, which seems intentional to create depth. However, the lamp in the foreground has an unusual shadow that might be considered an artifact.
| 8
|
||
1,963
|
Remove lamp
| 10
|
The original image (Image1) contains a lamp in the bottom left corner. In Image2, the lamp is successfully removed. There is no evidence of remaining parts of the lamp, and no other objects from the original image were removed. Moreover, no new objects were introduced, and there are no visible AI artifacts. The editing is done seamlessly.
| 9
|
The image exhibits a high level of quality with human proportions and body parts rendered realistically. There are no noticeable distortions or unusual object shapes. Some minor details such as slight inconsistencies in texture and color could be improved, but they are minimal.
| 9.486833
|
||
1,963
|
Remove watch
| 0
|
Image1 contains a watch on the left wrist of the person, which is the object to be removed. In Image2, the watch is still present on the wrist. Therefore, no object has been removed as per the instruction.
| 9
|
The image appears to be of high quality with well-proportioned body parts and natural object shapes. There are no significant distortions. However, there might be very subtle indications of AI generation in the textures or slight unnatural blending in some areas, but these are minimal.
| 0
|
||
1,963
|
Remove vase
| 10
|
Image1 contains a vase on the desk in the background. In Image2, the vase has been successfully removed without leaving any part of it remaining, introducing AI artifacts, or adding or removing other objects.
| 9
|
The image shows a high level of detail with no significant distortions or unusual body parts. The proportions of the human figure look natural, and the objects within the scene, such as the lamp and desk, appear correctly shaped. Minor imperfections, if any, are hard to pinpoint.
| 9.486833
|
||
1,963
|
Remove files
| 8
|
Image1 contains multiple files on the desk in the background. Image2 still shows some of those files, indicating that the removal was not complete. Therefore, deducting at least 2 points for not fully removing the objects as per instruction.
| 10
|
The image shows no noticeable distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The quality is high, with no evident artifacts.
| 8.944272
|
||
23,765
|
Remove woman
| 4
|
Image1 contains a woman in the foreground, prominently wearing a large white hat with flowers. Image2 has attempted to remove her and replace her with two other individuals. While the woman from Image1 is no longer present, new objects (two individuals) have been added in the same spot. Along with that, there are noticeable AI artifacts, especially around the faces and edges of the new individuals.
| 7
|
The image has a generally high level of technical quality with good proportions and realistic object shapes. However, there are minor distortions. Specifically, some of the faces and hands in the background show slight unnatural formations or blending artifacts that reveal imperfections typical of AI-generated imagery.
| 5.291502
|
||
23,765
|
Remove binoculars
| 0
|
Image1 contains binoculars held by people in the background. Image2 also contains binoculars held by people in the background. Therefore, the object to be removed (binoculars) is still present in Image2.
| 7
|
The image displays overall high-quality rendering but has a few notable issues. Some faces appear slightly distorted with unusual features, and the central figure's hat and scarf show some awkward folds and proportions. Additionally, some of the binoculars held by other characters have inconsistencies in shape and symmetry.
| 0
|
||
23,765
|
Remove top hat
| 10
|
In Image1, there is an individual in the foreground wearing a top hat. In Image2, the top hat of that individual is successfully removed. No other objects are removed, nor are any new objects added. There are no visible AI artifacts introduced in Image2.
| 9
|
The image displays minimal distortions; the body proportions and object shapes are mostly natural. The complex details of the flowers and binoculars are rendered accurately, with the fold and layering of the wrap showing high detail.
| 9.486833
|
||
23,765
|
Remove flower hat
| 10
|
Image1 contains the flower hat to be removed. Image2 successfully removes the flower hat without leaving any remaining parts of the object. Image2 does not remove any other objects that were not instructed to be removed. There are no new objects added in Image2. There are no noticeable AI artifacts introduced in Image2.
| 7
|
Overall, the image appears to be well-crafted with smooth textures and coherent shapes. However, upon closer inspection, some body parts and facial features of the individuals, particularly around the eyes and hands of the person in the foreground, appear slightly distorted or unnaturally proportioned. Additionally, a few of the binoculars' shapes exhibit minor irregularities. These subtle anomalies indicate the image is AI-generated, but they are not overly distracting.
| 8.3666
|
||
23,765
|
Remove scarf
| 10
|
Image1 contains a scarf, which is the object to be removed. In Image2, the scarf has been successfully removed. No additional objects were removed, and no new objects were added. There are no noticeable AI artifacts introduced in the edited image.
| 8
|
The overall composition is well-executed, with detailed textures in the clothing and hat. However, there are slight distortions in some of the facial features and an unusual shadow effect around the woman's face that looks slightly artificial. Additionally, the hands holding binoculars in the background show minor anomalies in shape and proportion.
| 8.944272
|
||
152,656
|
Remove boxers in the ring
| 0
|
The instruction provided was to remove boxers in the ring from Image1. In Image2, all of the boxers originally present in the ring from Image1 are still visible and remain unchanged. Therefore, the necessary objects (boxers) were not removed as per the instruction.
| 8
|
The image displays a high level of technical quality with well-defined human figures and objects. However, upon close inspection, there are minor distortions in some body proportions and slight irregularities in the shape of a few objects, such as the punching bags.
| 0
|
||
152,656
|
Remove two people sparring
| 8
|
Image1 contains two people sparring, which were intended to be removed. In Image2, the two people sparring have been removed. However, there are noticeable AI artifacts present where the two people sparring were previously standing. No new objects have been added, and no other objects have been removed. Due to the AI artifacts, the score is deducted.
| 8
|
Overall, the image has a high level of realism with minimal distortions. However, there are minor issues such as slight blurring and inconsistent lighting on some of the subjects. Additionally, there may be minor proportions issues with a few of the figures, such as slightly elongated limbs.
| 8
|
||
152,656
|
Remove person in black shirt
| 10
|
Image1 contains a person in a black shirt near the center. Image2 has successfully removed the person in the black shirt from the same position. No remaining objects that need to be removed, no incorrect objects are removed, and no AI artifacts are visible. No new objects have been added.
| 9
|
The image has a high level of detail and the proportions of the body parts are generally accurate. The shapes of objects appear natural, with no significant distortions or unusual features. There are minor inaccuracies in the positioning of the limbs, but these are not very prominent.
| 9.486833
|
||
152,656
|
Remove wooden cabinets
| 0
|
Image1 does not contain any wooden cabinets at all. Therefore, Image2 cannot remove something that does not exist in Image1.
| 8
|
The image is largely artifact-free with natural human forms and proportions. There is some slight distortion in the background objects and minor abnormalities in limb shapes, but overall these issues are not very noticeable.
| 0
|
||
9,156
|
Remove the person using lightning
| 8
|
Image1 contains a person using lightning. Image2 still has part of the person's arm and hand visible. Image2 does not remove any other objects or adds new objects, and there are no apparent AI artifacts.
| 8
|
The image exhibits minimal distortions and the body parts and proportions of the humanoid figures are reasonable. The object shapes, especially the electrical effects and the machinery, are well-rendered and consistent with the overall aesthetic. Slight deviations or artifacts are noticeable upon closer inspection, particularly around the glow effects and some edges, but they are minor.
| 8
|
||
9,156
|
Remove stormtrooper
| 10
|
1. Image1 contains the stormtrooper(s). 2. Image2 successfully removes the stormtrooper(s) that are in Image1. 3. No other objects from Image1 are removed in Image2. 4. No new objects are added in Image2. 5. Image2 does not introduce noticeable AI artifacts.
| 6
|
The image contains notable distortions, particularly with the electricity effects, which look somewhat unnatural and overly sharp. Some of the machinery and robotic parts in the foreground appear misshapen or oddly proportioned. The figures in the background have slightly unusual body proportions, indicating minor distortions.
| 7.745967
|
||
9,156
|
Remove lightning effect
| 4
|
In Image1, there is a noticeable lightning effect coming from the character's hand towards the other characters in the scene. Image2 contains a large reflective metallic object in place of where the lightning effect was originally located. The introduced object is not mentioned in the instruction, and parts of the original lightning effect are still visible. There are no extra removals or AI artifacts visible. Given that the instruction was simply to remove the lightning effect, which has not been entirely adhered to, and a new object was added, deductions are applied accordingly.
| 7
|
The image demonstrates generally good quality with some minor issues. There are slight distortions and unusual shapes in the metallic structure, and the lighting has some inconsistencies. The human figure is well-proportioned, but small details like the hand partially blend with the background effect.
| 5.291502
|
||
9,156
|
Remove the combat droid
| 6
|
Image1 features a combat droid on the right side, and Image2 attempts to remove the droid. While the combat droid has indeed been removed, Image2 introduces multiple significant artifacts where the droid was, disrupting the scene. Additionally, there seems to be traces of remaining effects from the interaction with the droid. No other objects have been added or removed incorrectly.
| 5
|
The image has noticeable distortions, particularly around the edges of the metal panels and the area near the glowing effect. There are some unnatural object shapes with the protruding elements and the inconsistent texture on the surfaces. The human character has some unusual proportions in the arm and hand, indicating minor artifacts.
| 5.477226
|
||
9,156
|
Remove the hand
| 8
|
The original image (Image1) contains a hand extended towards the scene. In the edited image (Image2), the hand is still present. No changes are observed between the two images. According to the first step, as the object to be removed (hand) is not removed, and remains in Image2, at least 2 points should be deducted.
| 7
|
The image generally looks coherent and visually appealing. However, some minor distortions and unusual object shapes are present. The lightning effects appear slightly unnatural, and the hands of the central character show some minor distortions.
| 7.483315
|
||
176,076
|
Remove ducklings
| 10
|
Image1 contains the ducklings that need to be removed. Image2 successfully removed the ducklings without leaving any remnants. There are no other objects removed or added, and no AI artifacts are noticeable in Image2.
| 10
|
The image appears to be free of distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, and unnatural object shapes. The grass looks natural and well-defined.
| 10
|
||
176,076
|
Remove mother duck
| 10
|
Image1 contains a mother duck and several ducklings. Image2 successfully removes the mother duck. No other objects that were not instructed to be removed are missing, and no new objects were added. There are no visible AI artifacts introduced in Image2.
| 4
|
The image has noticeable distortions and unusual shapes in the grass and water reflections. The body parts of the animals look distorted and are difficult to identify clearly, indicating significant AI-artifacts.
| 6.324555
|
||
176,076
|
Remove trees reflection
| 8
|
Image1 contains the reflection of trees which need to be removed. In Image2, the reflection of the trees has been mostly removed, but some faint residual reflections are still visible. No additional objects were removed beyond the reflection, and no new objects were added. There are no visible AI artifacts introduced.
| 9
|
The image appears natural with a minimal presence of distortions. There are no visible unusual body parts or proportions, and the objects (ducks) seem well-formed. The only minor issue is a slight blurriness, which might be due to the depth of field, but it does not significantly detract from the overall quality.
| 8.485281
|
||
176,076
|
Remove tall grass
| 5
|
Image1 contains tall grass. Image2 has removed the tall grass but also added new elements such as a line of rocks and replaced the background with a different kind of grass. The scene has also introduced visible AI artifacts, particularly around the added rocks and the outline of the duck. Additionally, the ducklings visible in Image1 are mostly hidden or altered in Image2.
| 7
|
The overall image is technically good, but the duck shows some distortions in proportions at the rear, giving it an unrealistic look. The rocks beneath the duck appear well-rendered, but the texture of the grass seems slightly repetitive. These are minor artifacts, but they detract from a perfectly natural appearance.
| 5.91608
|
||
176,076
|
Remove water patches
| 10
|
Image1 contains water patches along with ducks including a white duck. Image2 successfully removes the water patches as well as the ducks without introducing any new objects or noticeable AI artifacts.
| 10
|
The image shows natural-looking grass and water reflection with no visible distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes.
| 10
|
||
181,718
|
Remove microphone
| 6
|
In Image1, there is a microphone held by the person in the center. In Image2, the microphone has been removed. However, there are AI artifacts such as blurring and distortion around the person's hands and the area where the microphone was. No additional objects were introduced or removed apart from the microphone. The remaining artifacts impact the overall quality of the edit.
| 8
|
The image has a generally natural look with most elements appearing coherent. There are some minor issues, such as slight distortions around the hands and faces of some figures. Body proportions seem slightly off for a couple of individuals.
| 6.928203
|
||
181,718
|
Remove drum set
| 0
|
Image1 contains a drum set that needs to be removed as per the instruction. Image2 still contains the drum set without any visible changes or removal attempted. Therefore, it fails to follow the instruction.
| 8
|
The image exhibits mostly natural proportions and object shapes. The lighting and shadows are consistent, and there's no significant distortion. However, there is slight blurriness and minor artifacts around the hands of the central figure holding the microphone, as well as some unnatural edges on the instruments.
| 0
|
||
181,718
|
Remove guitarist
| 3
|
Image1 contains a guitarist. Image2 still contains the guitarist, but it seems the editor attempted to remove him by adding objects in front of him which resulted in no actual removal but partial covering. New objects such as a standing speaker have been added, and there are visible artifacts. Therefore, points must be deducted for not successfully removing the object, adding new objects, and introducing artifacts.
| 8
|
Overall, the image appears to be well-crafted with minor AI-artifacts. There is a slight distortion in the display of some objects in the background, such as the TV screen, which has some visual noise. Additionally, the person holding the guitar has a slightly unusual posture that could be indicative of AI-generation. However, these artifacts are minimal and do not significantly detract from the overall quality of the image.
| 4.89898
|
||
181,718
|
Remove singer
| 10
|
Image1 contains a singer in the center of the image. In Image2, the singer has been removed. No other objects appear to have been mistakenly removed or added, and the background is consistent with the original image. There are no noticeable AI artifacts introduced into the image.
| 7
|
The image mostly looks natural, but there are few noticeable artifacts such as slightly distorted musical instruments, and some lighting issues around the drummer's hands and drumsticks.
| 8.3666
|
||
22,006
|
Remove the person
| 10
|
Image1 contains several people. Image2 successfully removes all the individuals from Image1, following the instruction perfectly. There is no evidence of remaining objects that were to be removed, unnecessary object removals, new objects being added, or AI artifacts in Image2. The scene is seamlessly edited, making it difficult to tell that there were people initially present.
| 9
|
The image has high visual fidelity with detailed textures, proper proportions, and realistic object shapes. There are no noticeable distortions or unusual body parts, but some minor anomalies can be slightly detected in distant elements. Overall, it is nearly artifact-free.
| 9.486833
|
||
22,006
|
Remove red jacket
| 10
|
1. Image1 contains the red jacket on a woman seated in the center background.
2. Image2 successfully removes the red jacket.
3. Image2 does not remove other objects not in the instruction; all other elements remain intact.
4. No new objects are added in Image2.
5. There are no visible AI artifacts in Image2, and the editing appears seamless.
| 9
|
The image is almost free of artifacts; however, minor distortions and slightly unnatural body proportions can be observed upon closer inspection, particularly in the hand shapes and facial features.
| 9.486833
|
||
22,006
|
Remove glass of wine
| 8
|
Image1 contains the object, a glass of wine. In Image2, the glass of wine has been removed from the man's hand and replaced with a fork. No other objects were removed that were not instructed. Image2 did add a fork, which is a new object. No noticeable AI artifacts are present.
| 8
|
The image is largely free of distortions and unusual object shapes. The body proportions of the humans appear natural, and the overall scene is coherent. There are minor artifacts around the hands and faces if inspected closely. Additionally, some background elements may appear slightly blurred or less detailed.
| 8
|
||
22,006
|
Remove black jacket
| 10
|
Image1 contains people wearing a black jacket, so the object to be removed exists. In Image2, the black jacket is successfully removed from the person in the foreground, and no new objects are added. Other objects that were not part of the instruction are not removed. No visible AI artifacts are introduced.
| 9
|
The image is highly detailed with very few visible artifacts. The proportions of the people, their body parts, and the objects around them are mostly natural. There is a slight distortion in the reflection on the window and minor anomalies in the background. Overall, the image is very well-rendered.
| 9.486833
|
||
22,006
|
Remove window view
| 6
|
1. The original Image1 contains a window view. Therefore, we do not score 0 on this step. 2. The edited Image2 has successfully removed the window view and replaced it with a brick wall. There are no remaining elements of the window view. 3. The edited Image2 does not appear to have removed any objects other than the window view. 4. The edited Image2 adds a new object—specifically, a decorative ceiling feature that replaces the window view. This justifies a point deduction. 5. The edited Image2 introduces some AI artifacts such as the slightly blurry and uneven texture on the brick wall and ceiling feature. This justifies another point deduction.
| 9
|
The image is generally well-rendered with natural proportions and few distortions. Minor inconsistencies in object shapes and textures, particularly in some faces and hand positions, but overall high quality.
| 7.348469
|
||
92,971
|
Remove waves
| 8
|
Image1 does contain waves, so the score is not automatically 0. Image2 successfully removes the waves from the water. However, Image2 introduces AI artifacts in the area formerly occupied by waves. No new objects were added and no other objects removed.
| 10
|
The image exhibits no distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. It appears to be a clean and well-rendered aerial view.
| 8.944272
|
||
92,971
|
Remove beach
| 8
|
Image1 contains a beach on the left side. Image2 successfully removes the beach and replaces it with a sandy area that does not appear to be part of a beach. However, Image2 does not introduce new objects or remove other objects unrelated to the beach, and no significant AI artifacts are noticeable in the edited area.
| 10
|
The image shows no noticeable distortions, body parts, or unnatural object shapes. It appears free from AI-generated artifacts.
| 8.944272
|
||
92,971
|
Remove trees
| 6
|
1. Image1 contains trees. Proceed to next step.
2. Image2 does not contain remaining trees. Proceed to next step.
3. Image2 removes the beach and waves which are not in the instruction. Deduct 2 points.
4. Image2 adds new objects such as a different texture for the removed area. Deduct 2 points.
5. No visible AI artifacts in Image2.
| 9
|
The overall image quality is very high with minimal distortions. The road and fields are well-rendered, with clear and consistent lines. There is a slight unnatural repetition in the texture patterns of the fields, but this is barely noticeable.
| 7.348469
|
||
92,971
|
Remove road
| 10
|
Image1 contains a road that is visible from an aerial view. Image2 successfully removes the road, blending the area where the road was with the surrounding vegetation. No remaining parts of the road are visible in Image2. No extra objects are removed that were not instructed to be removed, and no new objects have been added. The transition appears smooth with minimal introduction of AI artifacts.
| 10
|
The image does not exhibit any noticeable distortions, unusual proportions, or unnatural object shapes. It appears clear and artifact-free.
| 10
|
||
62,083
|
Remove center person
| 10
|
Image1 contains the center person with the mask. Image2 successfully removes the center person following the instruction. There are no other objects removed or added that weren't included in the instruction. No AI artifacts are introduced.
| 9
|
The image is highly detailed with realistic lighting and reflections. The body proportions and object shapes are natural overall, though there is a slight blur and lack of detail in some background figures.
| 9.486833
|
||
62,083
|
Remove billboard
| 10
|
Image1 contains a billboard on the left side of the image. In Image2, the billboard has been removed successfully. No remaining parts of the billboard are visible. No additional objects were removed or added. There are no visible AI artifacts introduced in Image2.
| 8
|
The image demonstrates high technical quality with minimal distortions. The proportions of human figures and objects appear largely accurate, and the lighting is well-executed. However, some minor blurring and blending of edges on secondary characters and background elements can be observed, slightly reducing the overall sharpness.
| 8.944272
|
||
62,083
|
Remove skateboarder
| 8
|
1. Image1 does contain the skateboarder in the center of the image. 2. Image2 successfully removes the skateboarder from the image. 3. Image2 does not remove other objects that are not in the instruction. 4. Image2 does not add new objects. 5. Image2 introduces AI artifacts, such as blurriness and unnatural blending in the area where the skateboarder was removed, which affects the overall quality of the image.
| 7
|
The image largely maintains a realistic depiction with well-defined humans and objects. Some areas, particularly among the crowd, exhibit slight distortions and jagged edges. Proportions of body parts appear mostly accurate, but a few figures have marginally unnatural poses or shapes. Overall, the image artifacts are minimal but noticeable upon closer inspection.
| 7.483315
|
||
62,083
|
Remove left person
| 5
|
Image1 contains a person on the left, so the object to be removed is present. Image2 effectively removes the left person but introduces new objects (graffiti) and changes significant elements like the lighting and overall scene composition. This not only introduces new objects but also adds AI artifacts in the form of the altered environment.
| 9
|
The image shows minimal distortions and exhibits well-proportioned body parts and natural object shapes. However, there might be a slight unnatural blending in areas with graffiti and reflections on the wet ground, which reduces the score slightly.
| 6.708204
|
||
62,083
|
Remove right crowd
| 2
|
Image1 does contain a crowd on the right side that needs to be removed. Image2 fills the right side with a patterned mesh, covering the crowd. However, the patterned mesh introduced in Image2 is a new object and is quite conspicuous, violating rule 4. Furthermore, the patterned mesh introduces AI artifacts, resulting in an unnatural look, and violating rule 5.
| 3
|
The image exhibits notable distortions, particularly in the central portion with the bizarre geometric pattern that appears unnatural and out of place. Additionally, some objects in the background and the person on the right have unusual shapes and proportions. Overall, there are significant AI artifacts present.
| 2.44949
|
||
4,569
|
Remove doorbell
| 4
|
1. Image1 contains a doorbell to be removed, so we don't deduct any points here. 2. Image2 does not contain the doorbell any longer, so no deductions here either. 3. Image2 has removed an object that is not part of the instruction (the blue circle on the doorbell), so we deduct at least 2 points here. 4. Image2 has added a new object, possibly a door sensor, which was not part of the instruction. We deduct at least 2 points here as well. 5. Image2 introduces some minor AI artifacting around the new object, so we deduct at least 2 points here also.
| 10
|
The image displays no apparent AI-artifacts, distortions, or unnatural object shapes. The proportions and details are accurate and consistent.
| 6.324555
|
||
4,569
|
Remove door handle
| 10
|
Image1 contains a door handle on the right side of the door. Image2 successfully removes the door handle. There are no remaining parts of the door handle, no additional objects introduced, and no AI artifacts are noticeable. The scene in Image2 remains consistent with the original scene.
| 9
|
The image appears to be nearly free of distortions and unusual object shapes. The door and surrounding elements are well-proportioned, and the foliage has realistic texture and shape. However, there is a slight unnatural appearance to the texture of the object on the wall, which prevents a perfect score.
| 9.486833
|
||
4,569
|
Remove plants
| 8
|
1. Image1 contains the plants that need to be removed. 2. Image2 still contains some plants at the bottom part of the image near the doorbell. Thus, points are deducted for remaining objects. 3. No other objects were incorrectly removed in Image2. 4. No new objects were added in Image2. 5. There are no visible AI artifacts in Image2. Therefore, deductions apply mainly to the remaining plants.
| 10
|
The image shows no distortions, unusual body parts, or unnatural object shapes. It is visually clean and technically sound with no identifiable AI artifacts.
| 8.944272
|
||
4,569
|
Remove door panel
| 10
|
Image1 contains the door panel that needs to be removed. Image2 successfully removes the door panel as per the instruction. No additional objects were removed, no new objects were added, and there are no visible AI artifacts introduced in the editing process.
| 9
|
The image has minimal distortions, if any. The object shapes and proportions appear natural and accurately depicted. The doorbell and surrounding elements are clear and well-defined. There are no noticeable artifacts affecting the overall quality.
| 9.486833
|
||
4,569
|
Remove camera lens
| 8
|
Image1 contains a doorbell camera lens. In Image2, the doorbell camera lens is removed. However, the removal introduces AI artifacts where the doorbell used to be, visible by the unnatural blurring and smudging in the area. No additional objects were added or other objects removed.
| 10
|
The image shows no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes. The details and textures appear clear and realistic.
| 8.944272
|
||
8,078
|
Remove the people walking
| 10
|
1. Image1 contains people walking, so it passes the first check. 2. Image2 does not contain the people walking, so no points are deducted for remaining objects. 3. Image2 does not seem to have removed any objects other than the ones indicated in the instruction. 4. No new objects have been added in Image2. 5. No visible AI artifacts are present in Image2.
| 9
|
The image shows a high level of detail with minimal distortions and well-proportioned objects and architectural elements. The foliage, buildings, and sky are all rendered realistically. There may be very slight unnatural textures in the greenery, but they do not detract significantly from the overall effectiveness.
| 9.486833
|
||
8,078
|
Remove the balcony furniture
| 8
|
Image1 contains balcony furniture. Image2 successfully removes the balcony furniture as per the instruction. However, Image2 has added a new facade to the building which was not in the instruction. Therefore, 2 points need to be deducted for adding new objects. There are no apparent AI artifacts introduced in Image2.
| 9
|
The image is of high quality with well-rendered elements and minimal visible distortions. The buildings, trees, and other objects have natural shapes. However, a slight unnaturalness can be seen in some of the human figures in the foreground, causing a minor deduction in the score.
| 8.485281
|
||
8,078
|
Remove the fountain
| 10
|
Image1 contains a fountain. Image2 successfully removes the fountain that was in Image1, therefore following the instruction to remove the fountain. No remaining parts of the fountain are visible, and no parts of the image other than the fountain have been removed. No new objects have been added, and no AI artifacts are noticeable. The editing appears to be seamless.
| 9
|
The image is nearly artifact-free with realistic human figures, building structures, and natural landscapes. Minor imperfections are observed in reflections and fine details on the building.
| 9.486833
|
||
8,078
|
Remove the trees
| 6
|
Image1 contains trees that are supposed to be removed. In Image2, most of the trees have been removed, but there are still some trees remaining at the center-right section near the fountain and around the bushes. Thus, it contains remaining objects that should have been removed.
| 9
|
The image exhibits a high level of technical quality with minimal distortions. The proportions of human figures and structures appear natural. A closer look reveals minor imperfections in the background that could hint at AI generation but are not prominent.
| 7.348469
|
||
8,078
|
Remove the building structure
| 8
|
Image1 contains a building structure on the right side that needs to be removed. Image2 successfully removes this building structure. There are no remaining parts of the building visible, no other objects were unintentionally removed, and no new objects were added. However, Image2 introduces slight AI artifacts noticeable in the foliage where the building structure used to be.
| 10
|
The image appears to be free of any distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, and unnatural object shapes. The environment and objects are well-rendered and proportionate.
| 8.944272
|
||
4,152
|
Remove car
| 8
|
Image1 contains a car which needs to be removed. In Image2, the car is completely removed and the background appears consistent, although not perfectly blended in the middle area. There are no new objects added and no other objects removed. There are minor artifacts and the transition areas are not perfectly smooth.
| 4
|
The image has noticeable distortions and blurry areas, particularly in the upper part where the background appears smeared. The shape of the object in the foreground is unusual and lacks clear definition. There are also issues with uneven shading and texture distribution on the surface.
| 5.656854
|
||
4,152
|
Remove logo
| 0
|
Image1 contains multiple logos that need to be removed as per the instruction. Image2 has not only removed all the logos but also completely changed the entire car and its background. This introduces new objects and removes objects that were not part of the removal instruction.
| 7
|
The image has clear and well-defined elements, but there are some unusual aspects such as the fabric-like surface detail covering the car, which appears unnatural. The overall shape of the car seems slightly distorted, especially near the wheels.
| 0
|
||
4,152
|
Remove air intake
| 2
|
Image1 contains an air intake on the hood of the car. In Image2, the entire car is replaced with a different object. While the air intake is no longer present, other items also missing and new object is added which is not in the instruction.
| 9
|
The image is almost artifact-free with a single-piece object that appears well-defined. However, there is a subtle distortion on the surface that appears as unnatural streaks, which detracts slightly from the overall quality.
| 4.24264
|
||
4,152
|
Remove front wheel
| 6
|
Image1 contains a car with a visible front wheel. Image2 is intended to show the car with the front wheel removed. However, the front wheel is still partially present and visible in Image2. This does not completely fulfill the removal instruction. There are no other objects removed, no new objects added, and no visible AI artifacts in Image2.
| 9
|
The image demonstrates high technical quality with minimal noticeable distortions. The car's body parts and proportions look natural and well-rendered. The object shapes appear accurate and consistent with what would be expected of a high-performance vehicle. Only minor inspection reveals small potential artifacts.
| 7.348469
|
||
4,152
|
Remove license plate
| 0
|
Image1 contains a car with a visible license plate. Image2 does not contain any part of the original car, including the license plate. The task was to remove the license plate specifically, but Image2 changed the entire scene and removed the car completely, not following the specific instruction. This is considered as removing an object not in the instruction, constituting over-editing.
| 9
|
The image of the grill is highly detailed and free of obvious distortions or unusual shapes. The lines are consistent and the reflections are realistic. There is a minor imperfection in the symmetry, but it is negligible.
| 0
|
||
90,731
|
Remove the person sitting
| 8
|
1. Image1 contains a person sitting on a chair in the foreground. 2. Image2 removes the person sitting on the chair. However, the removal of the blanket that the person was using, initially on the chair, has some artifacts and the blanket now lies flat on the carpet, indicating a slight lack of precision. 4. Image2 does not add any new objects. 5. There is a noticeable AI artifact with the blanket looking unnaturally positioned on the floor. Therefore, points are deducted accordingly.
| 9
|
There are no significant distortions or unusual body parts, as there are no humans in the image. All objects have natural shapes and proportions, and details such as lighting and shadows are well-rendered. The only minor artifact is the slight blur on the right side of the wall by the door.
| 8.485281
|
||
90,731
|
Remove the blue chairs
| 10
|
1. Image1 does contain the blue chairs that need to be removed. 2. Image2 successfully removes the blue chairs. 3. Image2 does not remove other objects that are not in the instruction. 4. Image2 does not add new objects. 5. Image2 does not introduce any noticeable AI artifacts.
| 9
|
The image displays a well-constructed room with no significant distortions or unnatural object shapes. The body proportions of the furniture are accurate, and there are no visible artifacts. Minor areas to improve include slight inconsistencies in shadowing and texture.
| 9.486833
|
||
90,731
|
Remove the coffee table
| 0
|
Image1 contains the coffee table to be removed. Image2 still contains the coffee table; it has not been removed as per the instruction.
| 9
|
The image showcases a well-rendered scene with no significant distortions, natural proportions of objects, and generally natural shapes. Minor detail might seem slightly off, but overall it's an effective and artifact-free image.
| 0
|
||
90,731
|
Remove the lamp
| 10
|
Image1 contains a lamp on the left side of the sofa. In Image2, the lamp has been successfully removed. No other objects have been removed or added, and there are no noticeable AI artifacts introduced in the edited image.
| 8
|
The image is largely free of distortions and unnatural object shapes. However, there are minor issues such as the slightly unnatural shadowing on the right side of the image and the perspective of some furniture items, which look a bit off. Overall, it is a high-quality image with minimal artifacts.
| 8.944272
|
||
90,731
|
Remove the plant
| 4
|
Image1 contains a plant on the right side of the image on a white console table. In Image2, the plant has been successfully removed. However, Image2 has added new objects such as a decorative lantern and candle holder on the white console table, and there are AI artifacts visible in the form of unnatural shadows and blurry sections where the plant used to be. These new additions and artifacts affect the score.
| 9
|
The image is clean with natural object shapes, proper body proportions, and no apparent distortions. Small details like the reflections in the mirror and the patterns on fabrics are well rendered. One minor point is that the lighting in the image could be slightly more natural.
| 6
|
||
169,982
|
Remove police officer
| 10
|
1. Image1 does contain a police officer who needs to be removed. 2. Image2 does not contain the police officer, so the object to be removed is successfully removed. 3. Image2 does not remove other objects that were not in the instruction. 4. Image2 does not add new objects that were not in the original image. 5. There are no noticeable AI artifacts introduced in Image2; the edit appears seamless.
| 3
|
There are notable distortions in the image. The woman in the center has an unusually elongated torso, and there are irregularities in the proportions of the motorcycle, particularly around the engine compartment and wheel alignment. The pedestrians' body parts, especially the arms, look unnatural and poorly defined.
| 5.477226
|
||
169,982
|
Remove woman
| 8
|
Image1 includes a woman to be removed. Image2 successfully removes the woman from the scene. However, Image2 introduces AI artifacts where the woman was removed, causing noticeable visual inconsistencies in the background. No new objects are added and no other objects are removed.
| 9
|
The image is largely artifact-free with realistic proportions and object shapes. Minor distortions may be present but are negligible.
| 8.485281
|
||
169,982
|
Remove motorcycle
| 8
|
1. Image1 does contain the motorcycle to be removed. 2. Image2 does not contain any remaining part of the motorcycle. 3. Image2 does not remove any other objects that were not in the instruction. 4. Image2 does not add any new objects. 5. Image2 does introduce AI artifacts at the area where the motorcycle was removed, particularly noticeable in the pavement and road markings.
| 3
|
The image has several noticeable distortions and unusual body proportions. The legs of the person in uniform appear strangely shaped, and the arms and hands look oddly proportioned. The background objects are somewhat warped, especially the vehicles, indicating significant AI-artifacts.
| 4.89898
|
||
169,982
|
Remove white van
| 10
|
Image1 contains the white van on the right side. In Image2, the white van has been successfully removed and the space has been filled with other cars, content from the scene. No new objects have been added, and no other objects that were not mentioned in the instruction have been removed. There are no visible AI artifacts from the editing. Therefore, the edit follows the instructions perfectly.
| 7
|
The image appears mostly well-rendered, but there are a few noticeable distortions. The motorcycle's rear wheel looks slightly out of proportion and the license plate appears distorted. The uniform of the person in the middle has some vague areas around the edges.
| 8.3666
|
||
169,982
|
Remove helmet
| 8
|
Image1 contains a helmet held by the police officer. In Image2, the helmet is removed. However, the hand position looks unnatural and there are noticeable artifacts where the helmet was removed.
| 7
|
The overall image quality is quite good, but there are a few noticeable issues. There is a slight distortion around the police officer's hand and the motorcycle handle, and the text on the motorcycle plate appears slightly off. Additionally, there is some minor blurring and shape distortion in the background vehicles.
| 7.483315
|
||
163,418
|
Remove bucket
| 10
|
1. Image1 contains a bucket near the door. 2. Image2 has successfully removed the bucket from the scene. 3. No other objects appear to be removed that were not in the instruction. 4. No new objects have been added. 5. There are no visible AI artifacts in Image2.
| 9
|
The image has no noticeable distortions or unusual object shapes. The proportions and angles of the room and its elements appear natural and well-rendered. There is a slight blur or texture inconsistency on the floor that prevents a perfect score.
| 9.486833
|
||
163,418
|
Remove chairs
| 10
|
Image1 contains chairs near the doorway in the background. Image2 has successfully removed the chairs from this area. No new objects were added, no unnecessary objects were removed, and no AI artifacts are visible.
| 9
|
The image is generally free of distortions and artifacts, with well-proportioned elements and natural object shapes. The only minor issue is with the lighting and reflections on the tiled floor, which could be slightly off.
| 9.486833
|
||
163,418
|
Remove door
| 10
|
In Image1, there is a door visible on the right side of the image. In Image2, the door has been removed, and the wooden paneling is extended over where the door was, with no remaining parts of the door visible. No additional objects have been added, nor have other existing objects been removed. The edit looks natural with no AI artifacts introduced.
| 9
|
The image is mostly free from AI-artifacts. The room looks well-constructed, and the light reflections on the floor appear natural. There are no significant distortions, and the proportions of objects seem correct. The only minor issue is the slightly odd appearance of the distant objects in the room, which might look a little blurry.
| 9.486833
|
||
163,418
|
Remove tools
| 8
|
In Image1, there are clearly visible tools, particularly in the room seen through the open doorway. In Image2, these tools have been removed, and the space where they were is now clear. The edit did not introduce any new objects, and no AI artifacts are apparent. The only small issue is that a very small part of a tool appears to remain in the bottom corner of the opened door. This oversight leads to a small deduction in points.
| 10
|
The image appears to be clear and artifact-free. There are no visible distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, and all object shapes seem natural and consistent.
| 8.944272
|
||
163,418
|
Remove window
| 10
|
Image1 contains the window, which is the object to be removed. In Image2, the window on the far-left has been removed. There are no remnants of the window and no other objects have been unnecessarily removed. No new objects have been added. The edit appears clean with no visible AI artifacts.
| 10
|
The image appears to be free from AI-related artifacts. There are no distortions, unusual body parts or proportions, or unnatural object shapes visible.
| 10
|
||
126,953
|
Remove the trees
| 10
|
Image1 contains trees mainly in the foreground area near the grass. Image2 successfully removes these trees. No new objects are added, and no AI artifacts are introduced. Other objects not listed for removal were not removed.
| 9
|
The image shows minimal distortions, with natural body proportions and well-shaped objects. The architectural details are realistic, and there are no noticeable artifacts. Minor imperfections in the grass texture could be improved.
| 9.486833
|
||
126,953
|
Remove the columns
| 6
|
1. Image1 contains the columns to be removed. Proceed to step 2.
2. Image2 still contains parts of the columns to be removed. Deduct at least 2 points here.
3. No other objects are removed in Image2. No points deducted.
4. No new objects are added in Image2. No points deducted.
5. Image2 introduces AI artifacts around the area where columns were removed. Deduct at least 2 points here.
| 5
|
The architectural elements show some distortions and the texture on the large building section appears unnatural and inconsistent. The human figures have odd proportions and positioning, with some blending into the background. Overall, there are significant signs of AI-generated artifacts.
| 5.477226
|
||
126,953
|
Remove the sky
| 8
|
1. Image1 contains the sky to be removed, so the score is not 0.
2. Image2 still contains the sky, which was the object to be removed, so deduct at least 2 points.
3. Image2 does not appear to remove other objects not in the instruction.
4. Image2 does not add new objects.
5. Image2 does not introduce AI artifacts.
| 8
|
The image overall is quite clear with minimal distortions. The architecture and sky look relatively natural, although there is a minor issue with the clarity of the details and some edges appear slightly blurred. The people appear to have natural proportions and there are no immediately obvious distortions or unusual shapes.
| 8
|
||
161,461
|
Remove presenter
| 10
|
The presenter has been successfully removed from Image2, leaving the background and other objects intact. The editing did not add new objects, remove unintended objects, or introduce any noticeable AI artifacts.
| 9
|
The image shows well-proportioned human figures and realistic object shapes. There are no obvious distortions or significant AI-artifacts. However, there might be a minor unnatural blending of some elements upon closer inspection, such as edges of some objects.
| 9.486833
|
||
161,461
|
Remove projector screen
| 8
|
Image1 contains a projector screen situated on the right side where a speaker is standing. In Image2, the projector screen is successfully removed. However, the removal process has introduced AI artifacts, visible as irregularities in the texture where the screen was previously, particularly in the continuity of the tree leaves and some blurred areas around the speaker. The editing operation correctly avoids removing other objects or adding new objects.
| 8
|
Overall, the image quality is high with minimal distortions. The body parts and proportions of humans appear natural, and the objects are reasonably well-shaped. However, there are slight unnatural artifacts on some faces and in the texture of the foliage that marginally reduce the realism.
| 8
|
||
161,461
|
Remove tree branch
| 8
|
Image1 contains the tree branch that needs to be removed. Image2 successfully removes the tree branch, but it introduces some AI artifacts where the branch was previously located. The leaf patterns are inconsistent, and some areas look unnaturally blurred or distorted.
| 8
|
The image is mostly well-rendered with good detail and clarity. However, there are slight distortions in the garden foliage and the hair of some individuals in the audience. Body proportions appear mostly natural, but some minor deformations are noticeable upon close inspection.
| 8
|
||
161,461
|
Remove shed
| 3
|
1. Image1 contains the shed, so it qualifies for evaluation. 2. Image2 still contains the shed, albeit slightly obscured. 3. No other objects have been removed. 4. No new objects have been added. 5. No significant AI artifacts are evident.
| 9
|
The image overall has very few noticeable distortions or artifacts. The human figures appear proportionate, and the objects maintain natural shapes. Minor artifacts can be observed upon close inspection, but they do not significantly detract from the overall quality.
| 5.196152
|
||
161,461
|
Remove audience
| 2
|
Image1 contains an audience, but Image2 still has the audience present. Image2 also introduces AI artifacts in the bottom portion of the image where the audience was attempted to be removed. This introduces visible distortions in the image.
| 6
|
The image has noticeable distortions and artifacts, particularly around the tree and the people in the audience. Some faces and body parts appear slightly blurred or distorted. The shapes of some objects, such as the tree branches, seem somewhat unnatural.
| 3.464102
|
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 8