File size: 18,522 Bytes
81fafcb | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 | # AGENTS.md
Guidance for agents and contributors adding a source and cutting a release.
Read this before opening a PR. Source PRs and releases are separate: a source PR
adds one source with `release: None`; the maintainer later cuts one release that
bumps the version and docs for every source merged since the last one.
**Every source needs a recorded rights review before its PR and before its release:
open `.agents/skills/source-rights-review/SKILL.md` and follow it** (see "Rights
review" below; agents that don't auto-discover skills must open it by path).
## How the docs are actually maintained
The README is hand-written. `src/make_docs.py` refreshes only its generated
blocks: the stable line of the header, the counts in the current version's row of
the releases table, the Sources and Excluded tables, and Results (from
`artifacts/pattern_frequency_hf_snippet.md`). It fails if one of those blocks is
missing, and `src/test_make_docs.py` checks that the committed README is what it
renders. It also writes `LICENSE`, a `CHANGELOG` stub for a new version and the
*template* datasheets. What it does not do:
- It iterates `SOURCES` in `src/sources.py`; any source in `data/` but missing
from `SOURCES` is silently dropped from the table and totals.
- It stamps a regenerated datasheet's "Added" with the source's `added` field,
falling back to the global `ADDED` constant when the entry has none — so a new
entry without `added` still gets a wrong date.
- It does not write README narrative: the releases text, version details,
contributors, changes, notices and policy sections are edited by hand.
So datasheets and the README narrative are **hand/contributor-maintained**.
Never run `make_docs.py` and commit the result blind — `git diff` first and
restore anything it dropped or restamped.
## Before you start: check the findings log
`artifacts/source_findings.md` records sources already investigated, including
the rejected ones and *why*. Check it before spending a day on a source someone
already found to be blocked — and append your own finding there whether the
answer was yes or no.
## Rights review (required before a source PR and before a release)
**Follow `.agents/skills/source-rights-review/SKILL.md`** — method, failure classes,
templates. Do not rely on auto-discovery: open the file. HPLT was released on a
CC0 label that covered only the packaging of crawled pages and was removed after
v0.2.5; the 2026-10 audit (`artifacts/rights_audit_2026-10/`) found the same flaw
in five more shipped sources. Rules:
1. A licence on a platform, package or compilation is not a licence on the works
inside. Find who wrote the text and what *they* granted.
2. Unverified = not admitted. Merge with `release: None`; never release.
3. Read the full terms, not the badge: NC/ND, AI-training and scraping bans,
per-item rights fields. A fetcher reads the licence from upstream and fails on
NC/ND or AI-use clauses; it never hard-codes it.
4. Rights per item → per-row `license`, not one label. "Public domain" means every
author and translator died in 1955 or earlier (2026; life + 70).
5. Sample for third-party content (seed recorded, ≥40 docs per stratum, Wilson
interval, token share). Filters go in the committed fetch/clean script, with a test.
6. Name every intermediary (HF snapshot, SpeakLeash, dump) in the datasheet and
`provenance`, and write down what you did not check.
7. Record it: `license`/`license_spdx`/`legal_note` in `src/sources.py`,
`data/<key>/<key>.license-evidence.json`, a decision record, a findings-log entry.
8. Never write to rights holders, accept terms, create accounts or get past a
CAPTCHA — hand those to the maintainer.
## Add a source
1. Produce the artifact under `data/<key>/`:
- `<key>.parquet` — built by `src/build_dynaword.py` (LFS-tracked automatically).
- `<key>.stats.json` — doc/token/char counts (drives all totals).
- `<key>.md` — datasheet (see below).
2. Add the ingestion script: `src/fetch_<key>.py` or `src/clean_<key>.py`, so the
source is reproducible. `build_source` (build_dynaword.py) expects a
`<file_key|speakleash_key>.jsonl.zst` intermediate.
3. Register the source in `src/sources.py` (`SOURCES`) — required, or make_docs
never sees it. Copy an existing entry's shape: `pretty`, `license`,
`license_spdx`, `traceable`, `upstream`, `domain`, `created`, `is_ocr`, and the
`speakleash_key`/`file_key`. If the datasheet is hand-authored (rich provenance
or a fixed add date), add `"custom_datasheet": True` so make_docs leaves it
alone.
Also set `added` (the real add date) and `release`. `release` is what admits a
source to a release's totals: `None` means "on main, not in any release yet",
which is the correct value for a new source until the release that ships it is
cut. Nothing is counted just because it has a `stats.json`.
4. Add a contract test: `src/test_<key>_contract.py` (canonical schema, non-empty
text, positive token counts, uniform source/license, stats-file consistency).
Run `python3 -m pytest src/` before committing; install the test dependencies
once with `pip install -r requirements-dev.txt`.
### Keep the PR to your source
Many source PRs are open at once, and each one that touches shared files
conflicts with the others. A source PR changes only:
- `data/<key>/*`, `src/fetch_<key>.py` / `src/clean_<key>.py`,
`src/test_<key>_contract.py`;
- **one** new entry in `src/sources.py`, with `release: None`;
- your entry appended to `artifacts/source_findings.md`.
It does **not** touch `README.md`, `CHANGELOG.md`, `VERSION`/`RELEASE_DATE` in
`src/make_docs.py`, the phrase-frequency report, `AGENTS.md`, or other sources'
fetchers — those change in the release commit (below) or in their own PR.
`.gitattributes` already LFS-tracks `data/*/*.attribution.jsonl` and
`*.decisions.jsonl`; do not add per-file lines.
Commit with LF line endings — a CRLF `sources.py` shows as a whole-file rewrite
and conflicts with every other PR. Rebase onto `main` before asking for review.
## What the PR must show
These two are not optional — they are the difference between a source a reviewer
can accept and one that sits in the queue. Treat every source PR as a worked
example other contributors will copy.
1. **A sample of the data, inline in the PR description.** A few real documents
(or truncated ones), verbatim, so a reviewer can see at a glance what kind of
text this actually is — prose, transcripts, boilerplate, OCR noise, HTML
leftovers. Include the metadata columns too, not just `text`. Don't make the
reviewer download a parquet to find out — and a linked `.sample.jsonl` is not
a substitute: on the Hub it renders as one escaped line per document.
Generate it from the built shard and paste the output into the PR description:
```bash
python3 src/render_sample.py data/<key>/<key>.parquet -n 3
```
Each document is a fenced block — metadata as `key: value` lines, a blank
line, then the text with its real line breaks, truncated with `[…]`:
````
```
id: sejm_interpellations_2388
source: sejm_interpellations
added: 2026-07-19
token_count: 415
license: public-domain (official documents)
author: Daniel Milewski
Szanowny Panie Ministrze,
latem 2022 roku na podlaskiej części granicy z Białorusią ukończono […]
```
````
Pick rows that show the typical document; if the source has distinct
document types (question vs reply, article vs talk page), show one of each.
2. **Provenance and licensing, written out in the datasheet (`data/<key>/<key>.md`)
and summarized in the PR description:**
- Where the data comes from — the concrete origin (institution, portal, API,
dump), not just a domain name. Link it.
- Under what license, and **where that license statement lives** — link the
exact terms-of-use page, API docs section, or statute. "Public domain
because it's government data" is a claim, not a source; cite the provision.
- What the texts are — genre, register, time span, language variety, whether
they are OCR'd, machine-translated, or user-generated.
- How it was collected and filtered — dedup, minimum length, language ID,
anything dropped and why.
- The argument for inclusion — what this adds that the corpus does not
already have, and any known bias or quality caveat a downstream user should
weigh.
Yes, this is meta work on top of the fetching. That is the point: the datasheet
is the artifact other people read to learn how to contribute well.
## Normalize the text before you build
`build_dynaword.py` applies only *minimal gates* — strip, `len < 200`, Polish
diacritic ratio, OCR alpha ratio, exact sha1 dedup. It does **not** clean text.
`src/normalize_schema.py` is a schema/stats tool despite the name; it never
touches `text`. So normalization is the fetcher's job, and today each fetcher
reimplements it (`fetch_govpl.py:43` and `fetch_saos.py:42` carry byte-identical
`html_to_text`; `clean_samorzad_gov_pl.py:65` a third variant). If you are
writing a new fetcher, factor the shared parts out rather than pasting a fourth
copy.
What a fetcher should do to `text` before writing the `.jsonl.zst`:
- **Unicode**: NFKC normalize. Map non-breaking/thin/zero-width spaces to plain
space (or drop), strip control characters and soft hyphens, normalize the
quote/dash/ellipsis zoo. Repair mojibake if the upstream encoding is unreliable.
- **Whitespace**: collapse runs of spaces/tabs, trim per line, cap blank runs at
one empty line. Do not flatten paragraph breaks — they carry structure.
- **Structural junk**: navigation, cookie banners, "share this", pagination,
footnote back-references, and — for OCR/PDF sources — page headers/footers,
running titles, and hyphenation split across line breaks.
- **Numbering**: strip standalone chapter/section/page numbers and repeated
heading numerals (`1.`, `Art. 5.`, `Rozdział III`) *only where they are layout
artifacts*. In `dziennik_ustaw` or `saos` the article numbering is content —
removing it destroys the document. Judge per source, and say what you did in
the datasheet.
- **Boilerplate**: near-identical blocks repeated across most documents of a
source (license footers, institutional disclaimers, "Pokaż odpowiedź"-style UI
chrome) should be detected by frequency across the shard and removed, not
hand-listed.
- **Personal data**: do not keep a scrubber in this repo. Apply
[`SlayerLab/NERGAL`](https://huggingface.co/SlayerLab/NERGAL) before the
parquet is written (frozen regex ∪ model; placeholders `[PII]` / `[PHONE]`,
and `[PERSON]` with names on). A phone mask is `[PHONE]`; the NERGAL pass
renames the legacy `[Telefon]`, so no shard ships it.
Names of public officials acting in an official capacity are not PII and
should stay — removing them would gut parliamentary and judicial sources.
A source scrubbed some other way may still merge with `release: None`, but it
is not admitted to a release until its shard has been re-run through NERGAL.
The one exception is v0.2.6, which shipped before the NERGAL pass; the pass
runs on every source before v0.2.7.
Say in the datasheet which scrubber ran. Note that `main` is public on the Hub
whether or not a source is released.
Two rules about all of the above:
1. **The normalization must live in the committed fetch/clean script**, so the
shard is reproducible. A shard whose datasheet describes a cleaning step that
no script in `src/` performs is not reproducible, however good the intent.
2. **Report it in the datasheet**: which steps ran, and what the gates dropped.
Include a handful of before/after excerpts in the PR — this is the fastest way
for a reviewer to see whether normalization ate real content.
## Cut the release (maintainer, one commit after the source PRs merge)
0. In `src/sources.py`, set `release` on each merged source this release ships
(check its shard went through NERGAL first; v0.2.6 was the one exception), and
`removed` on each source it drops. A source is not released until its rights
review is recorded (see "Rights review").
1. In `src/make_docs.py`: bump `VERSION` and `RELEASE_DATE`.
2. Regenerate the phrase-frequency report and charts (registry-independent — it
globs `data/*/*.parquet`):
```bash
python3 src/pattern_frequency_report.py
```
Writes `artifacts/pattern_frequency_hf_snippet.md` + 10 PNGs; step 3 splices
it into the README "Results" section.
3. Edit `README.md` by hand: add a ``| `vX.Y.Z` | stable release | 0 | 0B |`` row
to the stable releases table (relabel the previous one), a Contributors row
for each new contributor, the version details and the main block of the
header. Then run `python3 src/make_docs.py`: it fills in the totals, the
header's stable line and the Sources and Excluded tables, from the
per-source `stats.json` files. `git diff` the result.
4. Append the release to `VERSIONS`, `DOCUMENTS` and `TOKENS` in
`src/plot_version_growth.py`, using the same stats sums as step 3. Then check the
paper (polish-dynaword-v2) against the tree:
```bash
python3 src/verify_paper_claims.py --tex ../polish-dynaword-v2/main.tex --ref worktree
```
It exits 0 once the paper describes this release. Without `--ref`, it reads
every repository file at the revision the paper's `\snapshot` pins.
5. Prepend the release notes to `CHANGELOG.md` under a new `## vX.Y.Z (date)`
heading. History is append-only — never rewrite earlier releases.
6. Tag the commit where the docs and the artifacts agree, and push the tag:
```bash
git tag -a vX.Y.Z <commit> -m "vX.Y.Z stable: <docs> documents / <tokens> tokens / <n> sources"
git push origin vX.Y.Z
```
A release with no tag can only be cited by hash, and every later doc fix
makes that hash a worse citation than the one before it — which is how
`v0.2.5` ended up cited three different ways. Tag it once and cite the tag.
## Push to Hugging Face
`origin` is the Hub itself
(`https://huggingface.co/datasets/SlayerLab/polish-dynaword`) — there is no GitHub
remote. `git push` authenticates through the git credential helper (macOS:
`osxkeychain`), which is separate from `hf auth login`: pushes can work fine while
`hf auth whoami` still reports "Not logged in". The Python API and `hf` CLI need
the login (or `HF_TOKEN`).
Hub pull requests use no forks and no named branches. A PR *is* the ref
`refs/pr/N` and the Hub assigns `N`, so you cannot open one by pushing — the ref
has to exist first. (Plain branches can be pushed, but a branch is not a PR and
nobody reviews it.)
Open a PR for work already committed locally:
```bash
# 1. create the empty PR (needs the write token)
python3 -c "
from huggingface_hub import HfApi
pr = HfApi().create_pull_request(
'SlayerLab/polish-dynaword', repo_type='dataset',
title='<title>', description='<what changed and why>')
print(pr.num, pr.url)"
# 2. push your local branch onto that ref
git push origin <local-branch>:refs/pr/<N>
```
Opened this way the PR starts in **draft** — publish it from the web UI.
Pick up an existing PR (42 here):
```bash
GIT_LFS_SKIP_SMUDGE=1 git -c fetch.negotiationAlgorithm=noop fetch origin refs/pr/42:pr/42
git checkout pr/42
git push origin pr/42:refs/pr/42
```
The `noop` negotiation is needed: for some refs the Hub fails the have/ack
exchange (`fatal: expected 'acknowledgments'`), and skipping it makes the server
send the full history instead. `GIT_LFS_SKIP_SMUDGE=1` keeps it to pointers;
pull a single blob with `git lfs pull --include <path>`.
`repo_type='dataset'` is required on every `huggingface_hub` call — this is a
dataset repo, not a model. Push straight to `main` only when cutting a release.
## Do not commit
`*.log` (fetch/build logs), `.DS_Store`, `src/__pycache__/`. Only `logs/` is in
`.gitignore` — root-level logs and OS cruft are not, so check `git status`
before staging. `*.parquet` is LFS-tracked; commit the pointer, not the blob.
## Known drift / cleanup opportunities
- `europeana` is in `SOURCES` but has no `data/` shard anywhere. make_docs
skips it with `! no stats`. Intentional placeholder or stale — confirm
before relying on `build_dynaword.py --all`.
- make_docs computes the current release's totals from the `stats.json` files in
the tree. After a released source is rebuilt on main, rerunning it with the
same `VERSION` would move the released counts; bump `VERSION` first.
- `uzp_orzeczenia_pl` is in `SOURCES` (`release: None`), but its data is held off
main until v0.2.8 (personal data). `src/build_uzp_orzeczenia_pl.py`, its
tests and `artifacts/uzp_orzeczenia_pl_ontology_manifest.json` stay, and the
legitimate-interest note is at `artifacts/uzp_orzeczenia_pl_legitimate_interest.md`
until the shard returns; make_docs skips it with `! no stats`.
- `sejm_interpellations` is in `SOURCES` (`release: None`), but its data is held
off main until v0.2.7 (letters from the public, some with health details).
Its fetch and attribution scripts and tests stay; `src/conftest.py` and the
attribution test's own guard skip the tests that read `data/sejm_interpellations/`,
and make_docs skips it with `! no stats`.
- `parliamentary` ships without the Sejm's interpellations, questions and
replies of the PPC dump: `HOLD_INTERPELLATIONS` in `src/fetch_parliamentary.py`
counts them as `interpellation_held` until v0.2.7 (NERGAL pass). Their code
path stays; `test_interpellations_are_built_whole_when_not_held` covers it.
For v0.2.7, set the flag to False, rebuild and update the card and stats.
- `kultura_bez_barier_pl` is in `SOURCES` (`release: None`), but its data is
held off main until the scope of its licence is answered. Its build, clean
and licence-basis scripts, tests and
`artifacts/kultura_bez_barier_pl_ontology_manifest.json` stay; `src/conftest.py`
skips the tests that read `data/kultura_bez_barier_pl/`, and make_docs skips it
with `! no stats`.
- The release tags `v0.2.0`-`v0.2.5` were deleted after the October 2026 rights
audit, so `git checkout v0.2.x --` and `revision="v0.2.x"` fail for them.
The eight builders whose inputs were only there (see CHANGELOG, Unreleased)
stay as the record of how v0.2.6 was built; `src/test_cited_paths.py` accepts
only `main` and tags from `v0.2.6` on.
|