polish-dynaword / AGENTS.md
ppuzio's picture
claude opus 5.5
kacperwikiel's picture
claude opus 5.5
PiotrSty's picture Maggio33's picture dawidmajewski's picture KateMajzel's picture bartoszkobylinski1's picture 1am's picture
Squash history: withdraw the Sejm's interpellations from parliamentary until v0.2.7
81fafcb
|
Raw History Blame
18.5 kB
# AGENTS.md
Guidance for agents and contributors adding a source and cutting a release.
Read this before opening a PR. Source PRs and releases are separate: a source PR
adds one source with `release: None`; the maintainer later cuts one release that
bumps the version and docs for every source merged since the last one.
**Every source needs a recorded rights review before its PR and before its release:
open `.agents/skills/source-rights-review/SKILL.md` and follow it** (see "Rights
review" below; agents that don't auto-discover skills must open it by path).
## How the docs are actually maintained
The README is hand-written. `src/make_docs.py` refreshes only its generated
blocks: the stable line of the header, the counts in the current version's row of
the releases table, the Sources and Excluded tables, and Results (from
`artifacts/pattern_frequency_hf_snippet.md`). It fails if one of those blocks is
missing, and `src/test_make_docs.py` checks that the committed README is what it
renders. It also writes `LICENSE`, a `CHANGELOG` stub for a new version and the
*template* datasheets. What it does not do:
- It iterates `SOURCES` in `src/sources.py`; any source in `data/` but missing
from `SOURCES` is silently dropped from the table and totals.
- It stamps a regenerated datasheet's "Added" with the source's `added` field,
falling back to the global `ADDED` constant when the entry has none — so a new
entry without `added` still gets a wrong date.
- It does not write README narrative: the releases text, version details,
contributors, changes, notices and policy sections are edited by hand.
So datasheets and the README narrative are **hand/contributor-maintained**.
Never run `make_docs.py` and commit the result blind — `git diff` first and
restore anything it dropped or restamped.
## Before you start: check the findings log
`artifacts/source_findings.md` records sources already investigated, including
the rejected ones and *why*. Check it before spending a day on a source someone
already found to be blocked — and append your own finding there whether the
answer was yes or no.
## Rights review (required before a source PR and before a release)
**Follow `.agents/skills/source-rights-review/SKILL.md`** — method, failure classes,
templates. Do not rely on auto-discovery: open the file. HPLT was released on a
CC0 label that covered only the packaging of crawled pages and was removed after
v0.2.5; the 2026-10 audit (`artifacts/rights_audit_2026-10/`) found the same flaw
in five more shipped sources. Rules:
1. A licence on a platform, package or compilation is not a licence on the works
inside. Find who wrote the text and what *they* granted.
2. Unverified = not admitted. Merge with `release: None`; never release.
3. Read the full terms, not the badge: NC/ND, AI-training and scraping bans,
per-item rights fields. A fetcher reads the licence from upstream and fails on
NC/ND or AI-use clauses; it never hard-codes it.
4. Rights per item → per-row `license`, not one label. "Public domain" means every
author and translator died in 1955 or earlier (2026; life + 70).
5. Sample for third-party content (seed recorded, ≥40 docs per stratum, Wilson
interval, token share). Filters go in the committed fetch/clean script, with a test.
6. Name every intermediary (HF snapshot, SpeakLeash, dump) in the datasheet and
`provenance`, and write down what you did not check.
7. Record it: `license`/`license_spdx`/`legal_note` in `src/sources.py`,
`data/<key>/<key>.license-evidence.json`, a decision record, a findings-log entry.
8. Never write to rights holders, accept terms, create accounts or get past a
CAPTCHA — hand those to the maintainer.
## Add a source
1. Produce the artifact under `data/<key>/`:
- `<key>.parquet` — built by `src/build_dynaword.py` (LFS-tracked automatically).
- `<key>.stats.json` — doc/token/char counts (drives all totals).
- `<key>.md` — datasheet (see below).
2. Add the ingestion script: `src/fetch_<key>.py` or `src/clean_<key>.py`, so the
source is reproducible. `build_source` (build_dynaword.py) expects a
`<file_key|speakleash_key>.jsonl.zst` intermediate.
3. Register the source in `src/sources.py` (`SOURCES`) — required, or make_docs
never sees it. Copy an existing entry's shape: `pretty`, `license`,
`license_spdx`, `traceable`, `upstream`, `domain`, `created`, `is_ocr`, and the
`speakleash_key`/`file_key`. If the datasheet is hand-authored (rich provenance
or a fixed add date), add `"custom_datasheet": True` so make_docs leaves it
alone.
Also set `added` (the real add date) and `release`. `release` is what admits a
source to a release's totals: `None` means "on main, not in any release yet",
which is the correct value for a new source until the release that ships it is
cut. Nothing is counted just because it has a `stats.json`.
4. Add a contract test: `src/test_<key>_contract.py` (canonical schema, non-empty
text, positive token counts, uniform source/license, stats-file consistency).
Run `python3 -m pytest src/` before committing; install the test dependencies
once with `pip install -r requirements-dev.txt`.
### Keep the PR to your source
Many source PRs are open at once, and each one that touches shared files
conflicts with the others. A source PR changes only:
- `data/<key>/*`, `src/fetch_<key>.py` / `src/clean_<key>.py`,
`src/test_<key>_contract.py`;
- **one** new entry in `src/sources.py`, with `release: None`;
- your entry appended to `artifacts/source_findings.md`.
It does **not** touch `README.md`, `CHANGELOG.md`, `VERSION`/`RELEASE_DATE` in
`src/make_docs.py`, the phrase-frequency report, `AGENTS.md`, or other sources'
fetchers — those change in the release commit (below) or in their own PR.
`.gitattributes` already LFS-tracks `data/*/*.attribution.jsonl` and
`*.decisions.jsonl`; do not add per-file lines.
Commit with LF line endings — a CRLF `sources.py` shows as a whole-file rewrite
and conflicts with every other PR. Rebase onto `main` before asking for review.
## What the PR must show
These two are not optional — they are the difference between a source a reviewer
can accept and one that sits in the queue. Treat every source PR as a worked
example other contributors will copy.
1. **A sample of the data, inline in the PR description.** A few real documents
(or truncated ones), verbatim, so a reviewer can see at a glance what kind of
text this actually is — prose, transcripts, boilerplate, OCR noise, HTML
leftovers. Include the metadata columns too, not just `text`. Don't make the
reviewer download a parquet to find out — and a linked `.sample.jsonl` is not
a substitute: on the Hub it renders as one escaped line per document.
Generate it from the built shard and paste the output into the PR description:
```bash
python3 src/render_sample.py data/<key>/<key>.parquet -n 3
```
Each document is a fenced block — metadata as `key: value` lines, a blank
line, then the text with its real line breaks, truncated with `[…]`:
````
```
id: sejm_interpellations_2388
source: sejm_interpellations
added: 2026-07-19
token_count: 415
license: public-domain (official documents)
author: Daniel Milewski
Szanowny Panie Ministrze,
latem 2022 roku na podlaskiej części granicy z Białorusią ukończono […]
```
````
Pick rows that show the typical document; if the source has distinct
document types (question vs reply, article vs talk page), show one of each.
2. **Provenance and licensing, written out in the datasheet (`data/<key>/<key>.md`)
and summarized in the PR description:**
- Where the data comes from — the concrete origin (institution, portal, API,
dump), not just a domain name. Link it.
- Under what license, and **where that license statement lives** — link the
exact terms-of-use page, API docs section, or statute. "Public domain
because it's government data" is a claim, not a source; cite the provision.
- What the texts are — genre, register, time span, language variety, whether
they are OCR'd, machine-translated, or user-generated.
- How it was collected and filtered — dedup, minimum length, language ID,
anything dropped and why.
- The argument for inclusion — what this adds that the corpus does not
already have, and any known bias or quality caveat a downstream user should
weigh.
Yes, this is meta work on top of the fetching. That is the point: the datasheet
is the artifact other people read to learn how to contribute well.
## Normalize the text before you build
`build_dynaword.py` applies only *minimal gates* — strip, `len < 200`, Polish
diacritic ratio, OCR alpha ratio, exact sha1 dedup. It does **not** clean text.
`src/normalize_schema.py` is a schema/stats tool despite the name; it never
touches `text`. So normalization is the fetcher's job, and today each fetcher
reimplements it (`fetch_govpl.py:43` and `fetch_saos.py:42` carry byte-identical
`html_to_text`; `clean_samorzad_gov_pl.py:65` a third variant). If you are
writing a new fetcher, factor the shared parts out rather than pasting a fourth
copy.
What a fetcher should do to `text` before writing the `.jsonl.zst`:
- **Unicode**: NFKC normalize. Map non-breaking/thin/zero-width spaces to plain
space (or drop), strip control characters and soft hyphens, normalize the
quote/dash/ellipsis zoo. Repair mojibake if the upstream encoding is unreliable.
- **Whitespace**: collapse runs of spaces/tabs, trim per line, cap blank runs at
one empty line. Do not flatten paragraph breaks — they carry structure.
- **Structural junk**: navigation, cookie banners, "share this", pagination,
footnote back-references, and — for OCR/PDF sources — page headers/footers,
running titles, and hyphenation split across line breaks.
- **Numbering**: strip standalone chapter/section/page numbers and repeated
heading numerals (`1.`, `Art. 5.`, `Rozdział III`) *only where they are layout
artifacts*. In `dziennik_ustaw` or `saos` the article numbering is content —
removing it destroys the document. Judge per source, and say what you did in
the datasheet.
- **Boilerplate**: near-identical blocks repeated across most documents of a
source (license footers, institutional disclaimers, "Pokaż odpowiedź"-style UI
chrome) should be detected by frequency across the shard and removed, not
hand-listed.
- **Personal data**: do not keep a scrubber in this repo. Apply
[`SlayerLab/NERGAL`](https://huggingface.co/SlayerLab/NERGAL) before the
parquet is written (frozen regex ∪ model; placeholders `[PII]` / `[PHONE]`,
and `[PERSON]` with names on). A phone mask is `[PHONE]`; the NERGAL pass
renames the legacy `[Telefon]`, so no shard ships it.
Names of public officials acting in an official capacity are not PII and
should stay — removing them would gut parliamentary and judicial sources.
A source scrubbed some other way may still merge with `release: None`, but it
is not admitted to a release until its shard has been re-run through NERGAL.
The one exception is v0.2.6, which shipped before the NERGAL pass; the pass
runs on every source before v0.2.7.
Say in the datasheet which scrubber ran. Note that `main` is public on the Hub
whether or not a source is released.
Two rules about all of the above:
1. **The normalization must live in the committed fetch/clean script**, so the
shard is reproducible. A shard whose datasheet describes a cleaning step that
no script in `src/` performs is not reproducible, however good the intent.
2. **Report it in the datasheet**: which steps ran, and what the gates dropped.
Include a handful of before/after excerpts in the PR — this is the fastest way
for a reviewer to see whether normalization ate real content.
## Cut the release (maintainer, one commit after the source PRs merge)
0. In `src/sources.py`, set `release` on each merged source this release ships
(check its shard went through NERGAL first; v0.2.6 was the one exception), and
`removed` on each source it drops. A source is not released until its rights
review is recorded (see "Rights review").
1. In `src/make_docs.py`: bump `VERSION` and `RELEASE_DATE`.
2. Regenerate the phrase-frequency report and charts (registry-independent — it
globs `data/*/*.parquet`):
```bash
python3 src/pattern_frequency_report.py
```
Writes `artifacts/pattern_frequency_hf_snippet.md` + 10 PNGs; step 3 splices
it into the README "Results" section.
3. Edit `README.md` by hand: add a ``| `vX.Y.Z` | stable release | 0 | 0B |`` row
to the stable releases table (relabel the previous one), a Contributors row
for each new contributor, the version details and the main block of the
header. Then run `python3 src/make_docs.py`: it fills in the totals, the
header's stable line and the Sources and Excluded tables, from the
per-source `stats.json` files. `git diff` the result.
4. Append the release to `VERSIONS`, `DOCUMENTS` and `TOKENS` in
`src/plot_version_growth.py`, using the same stats sums as step 3. Then check the
paper (polish-dynaword-v2) against the tree:
```bash
python3 src/verify_paper_claims.py --tex ../polish-dynaword-v2/main.tex --ref worktree
```
It exits 0 once the paper describes this release. Without `--ref`, it reads
every repository file at the revision the paper's `\snapshot` pins.
5. Prepend the release notes to `CHANGELOG.md` under a new `## vX.Y.Z (date)`
heading. History is append-only — never rewrite earlier releases.
6. Tag the commit where the docs and the artifacts agree, and push the tag:
```bash
git tag -a vX.Y.Z <commit> -m "vX.Y.Z stable: <docs> documents / <tokens> tokens / <n> sources"
git push origin vX.Y.Z
```
A release with no tag can only be cited by hash, and every later doc fix
makes that hash a worse citation than the one before it — which is how
`v0.2.5` ended up cited three different ways. Tag it once and cite the tag.
## Push to Hugging Face
`origin` is the Hub itself
(`https://huggingface.co/datasets/SlayerLab/polish-dynaword`) — there is no GitHub
remote. `git push` authenticates through the git credential helper (macOS:
`osxkeychain`), which is separate from `hf auth login`: pushes can work fine while
`hf auth whoami` still reports "Not logged in". The Python API and `hf` CLI need
the login (or `HF_TOKEN`).
Hub pull requests use no forks and no named branches. A PR *is* the ref
`refs/pr/N` and the Hub assigns `N`, so you cannot open one by pushing — the ref
has to exist first. (Plain branches can be pushed, but a branch is not a PR and
nobody reviews it.)
Open a PR for work already committed locally:
```bash
# 1. create the empty PR (needs the write token)
python3 -c "
from huggingface_hub import HfApi
pr = HfApi().create_pull_request(
'SlayerLab/polish-dynaword', repo_type='dataset',
title='<title>', description='<what changed and why>')
print(pr.num, pr.url)"
# 2. push your local branch onto that ref
git push origin <local-branch>:refs/pr/<N>
```
Opened this way the PR starts in **draft** — publish it from the web UI.
Pick up an existing PR (42 here):
```bash
GIT_LFS_SKIP_SMUDGE=1 git -c fetch.negotiationAlgorithm=noop fetch origin refs/pr/42:pr/42
git checkout pr/42
git push origin pr/42:refs/pr/42
```
The `noop` negotiation is needed: for some refs the Hub fails the have/ack
exchange (`fatal: expected 'acknowledgments'`), and skipping it makes the server
send the full history instead. `GIT_LFS_SKIP_SMUDGE=1` keeps it to pointers;
pull a single blob with `git lfs pull --include <path>`.
`repo_type='dataset'` is required on every `huggingface_hub` call — this is a
dataset repo, not a model. Push straight to `main` only when cutting a release.
## Do not commit
`*.log` (fetch/build logs), `.DS_Store`, `src/__pycache__/`. Only `logs/` is in
`.gitignore` — root-level logs and OS cruft are not, so check `git status`
before staging. `*.parquet` is LFS-tracked; commit the pointer, not the blob.
## Known drift / cleanup opportunities
- `europeana` is in `SOURCES` but has no `data/` shard anywhere. make_docs
skips it with `! no stats`. Intentional placeholder or stale — confirm
before relying on `build_dynaword.py --all`.
- make_docs computes the current release's totals from the `stats.json` files in
the tree. After a released source is rebuilt on main, rerunning it with the
same `VERSION` would move the released counts; bump `VERSION` first.
- `uzp_orzeczenia_pl` is in `SOURCES` (`release: None`), but its data is held off
main until v0.2.8 (personal data). `src/build_uzp_orzeczenia_pl.py`, its
tests and `artifacts/uzp_orzeczenia_pl_ontology_manifest.json` stay, and the
legitimate-interest note is at `artifacts/uzp_orzeczenia_pl_legitimate_interest.md`
until the shard returns; make_docs skips it with `! no stats`.
- `sejm_interpellations` is in `SOURCES` (`release: None`), but its data is held
off main until v0.2.7 (letters from the public, some with health details).
Its fetch and attribution scripts and tests stay; `src/conftest.py` and the
attribution test's own guard skip the tests that read `data/sejm_interpellations/`,
and make_docs skips it with `! no stats`.
- `parliamentary` ships without the Sejm's interpellations, questions and
replies of the PPC dump: `HOLD_INTERPELLATIONS` in `src/fetch_parliamentary.py`
counts them as `interpellation_held` until v0.2.7 (NERGAL pass). Their code
path stays; `test_interpellations_are_built_whole_when_not_held` covers it.
For v0.2.7, set the flag to False, rebuild and update the card and stats.
- `kultura_bez_barier_pl` is in `SOURCES` (`release: None`), but its data is
held off main until the scope of its licence is answered. Its build, clean
and licence-basis scripts, tests and
`artifacts/kultura_bez_barier_pl_ontology_manifest.json` stay; `src/conftest.py`
skips the tests that read `data/kultura_bez_barier_pl/`, and make_docs skips it
with `! no stats`.
- The release tags `v0.2.0`-`v0.2.5` were deleted after the October 2026 rights
audit, so `git checkout v0.2.x --` and `revision="v0.2.x"` fail for them.
The eight builders whose inputs were only there (see CHANGELOG, Unreleased)
stay as the record of how v0.2.6 was built; `src/test_cited_paths.py` accepts
only `main` and tags from `v0.2.6` on.